<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Reason Why Poker.org Sold For $1,000,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/</link>
	<description>The Direct Navigation Industry Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mee</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>mee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>This price was very high!!!  I don&#039;t believe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This price was very high!!!  I don&#8217;t believe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashid Mahmood</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid Mahmood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-947</guid>
		<description>This price was very high, good luck to new owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This price was very high, good luck to new owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Corelli</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Corelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-896</guid>
		<description>The reason dot net and dot org gaming names are selling like crazy is because of the jurisdiction of the dot com registrar. It makes poker.org a truly brilliant purchase. Until a change occurs in US gaming laws, it is probably worth far more than poker.com. I finally get why my fivecard.com domain has little value....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason dot net and dot org gaming names are selling like crazy is because of the jurisdiction of the dot com registrar. It makes poker.org a truly brilliant purchase. Until a change occurs in US gaming laws, it is probably worth far more than poker.com. I finally get why my fivecard.com domain has little value&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Corelli</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Corelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Poker.org might be worth more today than poker.com because of the jurisdictional location of the dot com registrar and restrictive US gaming laws. This was a truly brilliant purchase and was probably undervalued; certainly not how it appears at first blush, though. That deal finally allowed me to understand why my fivecard.com domain isn&#039;t worth much. But a change in US law could quickly upend dot net and dot org gaming names... and bring dot coms back to life...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poker.org might be worth more today than poker.com because of the jurisdictional location of the dot com registrar and restrictive US gaming laws. This was a truly brilliant purchase and was probably undervalued; certainly not how it appears at first blush, though. That deal finally allowed me to understand why my fivecard.com domain isn&#8217;t worth much. But a change in US law could quickly upend dot net and dot org gaming names&#8230; and bring dot coms back to life&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Borgos</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Borgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-877</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree at all. Poker.org was sold to a company in the domain industry, so they obviously think they can make enough money from developing it to cover the huge price. They have experience gambling .org domains already and must have some advantage when it comes to that (like getting it listed at the top of Google).  Mainly, the domain had a significant value to any speculator.  iReport.com was sold to an end user (cnn.com) and the value was based on the fact cnn wanted that particular domain because they had already chosen that name for their reporting service, and buying the domain for whatever it cost was a drop in the bucket for them. I don&#039;t think the domain itself had any significant value at all to a domain speculator.  Yes, in both cases the sellers drove a hard bargain to get those amazing prices, but that is not the whole story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree at all. Poker.org was sold to a company in the domain industry, so they obviously think they can make enough money from developing it to cover the huge price. They have experience gambling .org domains already and must have some advantage when it comes to that (like getting it listed at the top of Google).  Mainly, the domain had a significant value to any speculator.  iReport.com was sold to an end user (cnn.com) and the value was based on the fact cnn wanted that particular domain because they had already chosen that name for their reporting service, and buying the domain for whatever it cost was a drop in the bucket for them. I don&#8217;t think the domain itself had any significant value at all to a domain speculator.  Yes, in both cases the sellers drove a hard bargain to get those amazing prices, but that is not the whole story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Well said.. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.. <img src='http://directnavigation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reason Why Poker.org Sold For $1000000 &#124; DirectNavigation.com</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reason Why Poker.org Sold For $1000000 &#124; DirectNavigation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-863</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Mylar wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptLast week, it was announced that Poker.org sold for $1000000. Most people were surprised by the amount. I wasn&#8217;t. The same people were surprised when. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Mylar wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptLast week, it was announced that Poker.org sold for $1000000. Most people were surprised by the amount. I wasn&#8217;t. The same people were surprised when. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perchboy</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Perchboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Well reasoned analysis and perfectly stated.

I was wondering the same thing about iReport.com compared to Poker.org.  

One other consideration: Numerous organizations within the industries involved which bought those two domains (television news &amp; gaming) appear to have sufficient capital to buy whatever they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well reasoned analysis and perfectly stated.</p>
<p>I was wondering the same thing about iReport.com compared to Poker.org.  </p>
<p>One other consideration: Numerous organizations within the industries involved which bought those two domains (television news &amp; gaming) appear to have sufficient capital to buy whatever they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://directnavigation.com/2010/02/the-reason-why-poker-org-sold-for-1000000/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directnavigation.com/?p=344#comment-861</guid>
		<description>The only difference between a Gorgeous $200 street whore and a Gorgeous $3000 call girl.......is the asking price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only difference between a Gorgeous $200 street whore and a Gorgeous $3000 call girl&#8230;&#8230;.is the asking price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

